Client Alert: From the Scheer Law Group: U.S. Supreme Court Rules that Filing a POC that May be Time Barred Is not a Violation of the FDCPA

Client Alert: From the

Date: May 16, 2017
Client Alert:
To: All Scheer Law Group Clients and Affiliates:
Subject: U.S. Supreme Court Rules that Filing a Bankruptcy Proof of Claim that may be Time Barred Is not a Violation of the FDCPA

The right to collect on a debt may generally be challenged by the borrower as beyond the statute of limitations in the particular state where the debt was created. This does not automatically mean the debt can’t be collected, as an obligation can be revived or there may be other defenses asserted by a creditor contesting that the debt is barred. However, most creditors will file a proof of claim in a bankruptcy proceeding, even on a “stale debt”, with the hope that they will be paid something. The U.S. Supreme Court has now ruled on whether filing such claims is a false, deceptive and misleading act under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and found that it is not (See In Midland Funding LLC v. Johnson, 16-348 (Sup. Ct. May 15, 2017).

Practically, this means that every creditor should file a proof of claim in a bankruptcy proceeding (assuming the amount at issue justifies the effort), as failure to do so will in some cases cause the creditor to lose the right to payment on secured, as well as unsecured obligation. However, this decision also gives new impetus to creditors to file claims on obligations which may have been dormant for years, and thought to be uncollectable.

Beyond the implications to creditors collecting on their own debts, is the impact on debt buyers who buy “stale debt” for pennies on the dollar and then seek to collect on the debt in a bankruptcy proceeding, where a trustee or debtor will not have the interest or resources to object to the claim, allowing payment of all or a portion of the claim. This ruling gives debt purchasers more reason to buy debt, even “stale” debt.

Important Note:

The Supreme Court will hear the case of Henson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.. later this year and will rule on whether a debt buyer who purchases debts is exempt from FDCPA regulation. If he answer is yes, it would provide further insulation to debt buyers and less liability.

Please call or email if you would like to discuss

Spencer Scheer

Recent Posts




Northern California Office

155 N. Redwood Drive, Suite 100
San Rafael, CA 94903
Telephone: (415) 491-8900
Facsimile: (415) 491-8910

Southern California Office

85 Argonaut, Suite 202
Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
Telephone: (949) 263-8757
Facsimile: (949) 308-7373

Send Us Your Information &
Get Started Today

Fields Marked With An “*” Are Required

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.